So we’ve sketched stress-strain. A curve like this
for typical metal. And we know an equation within
the linear elastic region. That’s before the
proportional limit. And that’s, of course,
Hooke’s Law– sigma equals E times epsilon. But what do we have after
plastic deformation? How can we perform calculations
after plastic deformation? If, for example,
we had something that– a bolt in
the ceiling– oh, that’s a horrendous drawing. Let’s fix that. Let’s fix that
before I lose my job. So here’s– that’s even worse. Oh, my goodness. OK. This is good. No, that’s still awful. But there’s a hook
and, I don’t know, something is hanging from it. I was going to draw
a force so I don’t have to draw something else. There’s a hook hanging
from the ceiling and you apply a
force to it and you want to know,
well, how much does that tie– that’s
what that is– it’s called intention– that
tensile tie– elongate? What’s its distance? What’s its length? And, well, you can only, at this point, do calculations
if the force results in a stress that’s
less than the yield strength. If it’s more than that, while
it’s classically deformed, we couldn’t deal
with it unless we had some kind of
way of describing the shape of the
curve after it leaves the linear elastic region. And it’s nice. We do have an
equation that fits the curve. But it’s going– we can’t
use engineering stress. We have to use what’s
called true stress. So that’s what I’d like to
introduce to you right now. So again, we’re going to take
a look at a generalized sample here. And the idea– the
goal– is of course that we’re going to go to
be able to this– calculate and understand
plastic deformation. So here’s our sample with its
initial cross-sectional area as we’ve discussed before. And we said, well,
when you load it, it gets longer
and gets narrower. And it’s that reduction in
the cross-sectional area that we’re interested in. This area here now, we could
call it an instantaneous area. Whereas this area, the white
one, was the initial area. The initial area was
what we started with. But then while the load
is applied– sorry, let me draw the force in. While the load is applied,
the cross-sectional area has decreased. So the first thing
you could do is we could say, all right, well, that
means that this material itself is experiencing a
force over a smaller area. So we could define
the true stress as the force over that
actual cross-sectional area. This is the true stress. This is the stress that
the material itself is feeling. OK? And that subscript
I am telling us this is the instantaneous
cross-sectional area. Instantaneous. I can’t do more than one thing
at the same time. Instantaneous– I missed a
U– cross-sectional area. Instantaneous cross-sectional area. And I’ll show you
what the plot would look like in just a moment. We could also do the same
thing for the strain, although that’s going to be
just a little bit– require a little bit more thinking. The true strain has to
account for the fact that what we’re doing is we’re
applying a change in length. Right? We’re elongating it
over a certain length. The very first little
bit of elongation is elongation over l0. But then, after
that, the elongation is elongated over the
previous length which was l0 plus that little delta l. And so if you do that
for infinitely small– infinitesimally small
changes in length, the way we would write that
is we’d have to say, the true strain, what we’re
doing is we’re integrating. We’re integrating those
infinitesimally small changes in length– that’s dl– by l
from l0– the initial length– to the instantaneous length. And so if we do that,
you find that you have ln of l instantaneous
minus length 0, which is ln of l instantaneous over l0. So we have another
equation there. I’ll put a box around that. So this is the true strain. True strain. And if we take that true
stress and we plot it against the true strain,
I’ll show you what we get. Let me just
plot stress and strain and I’ll show you what
we’ve already seen. That’s the engineering
stress-strain curve. And then what I’ll do is I’ll
plot for you– after it starts to plastically deform the–
ran out of space there– the true stress– so this one
here– continues to increase. It doesn’t have that
decrease at the UTS. That’s the true stress
true strain curve. And this one is, of
course, engineering. The nice thing
about this plot is once you’ve got true
stress and true strain, we can fit that data
quite nicely for most metals with a simple equation. And that is true stress
is equal to this coefficient times the true strain
raised to the power n. So that’s an equation that fits
that true stress true strain data quite nicely. And what’s useful about
this is these are constants. That’s the constant n– I’ll
define it for you in a moment– and this K is also a constant. Those are material properties. We can look those up in
an engineering handbook. So n is called the–
well, this equation is called the
strain-hardening equation. Strain hardening equation. And strain hardening– hardening
correlates to– hardness correlates to strength. So really this is
the equation that’s telling us that we’re
strengthening the material and we’ve got the
strain hardening exponent and the strain
hardening coefficient K.As found on YouTubeExplaindio Agency Edition FREE Training How to Create Explainer Videos & SELL or RENT them! Join this FREE webinar | Work Less & Earn More With Explaindio AGENCY EDITION
What does the Bible teach about head-covering for women in the church meetings?– If we ignore any command of God in Scripture (however small) we will suffer some eternal loss (Rev.22:19).– Those who cancel (or teach against) the smallest command of Scripture will be called “the least in the kingdom of heaven” (as Jesus said in Matt.5:19).– God tests our honesty in the way in which we deal with such verses of Scripture. He does not see whether we understand everything in His Word, but He does see if we are honest in dealing with His Word. The Lord says, “To this one I will look, to him who is humble and contrite of spirit, and who trembles at My word” (Isa.66:2).There are at least three reasons given in the New Testament why a #woman should cover her head when she #prays or #prophesies in the meetings of the #church:First: The Bible says, “A man should NOT cover his head.” . and the reason given is: “. because he is the image and glory of God”. In contrast, we are told, “but the woman is the glory of man” (1 Cor.11:7). The glory of man must be covered in the church . and since woman is the glory of man, she testifies to this fact by covering her head. This is the plain and simple meaning of this verse.Second: The Bible says, “A woman’s long hair is her glory” (1 Cor.11:15). The glory of the woman also must be covered in the church, just like the glory of man. And so she must cover her head which has the glory of her long hair. Almost all women are conscious that their long hair is a major part of what makes them look attractive . and that is why even among those women who do put a covering on their heads, most of them cover only a part of their hair!! If a woman does not want to cover her head, then the only alternative that the New Testament offers is to remove that glory, by shaving her head completely: “If a woman does not cover her head, let her also have her hair cut off; but if it is disgraceful for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, let her cover her head” (1 Cor.11:6).Third: The Bible says: “Man was not created for the woman’s sake, but woman for the man’s sake. Therefore the woman ought to have a symbol of authority on her head, because of the angels” (1 Cor.11:10). The head-covering symbolizes the fact that a woman accepts her God-appointed role as having been created “for man’s sake” as his helper and therefore her willingness to be submissive to male authority – whether as a wife to her husband, or as a daughter to her father, or as a sister in the church to the church-elders. It is significant that the disappearance of the head-covering from women in Western churches (on a large scale) coincided with the time that the movement for “Women’s Liberation” (a phrase used in a book in 1949) began to spread in Western countries . about 60 years ago. The “angels” mentioned in this verse could refer either to the fallen angels or to the angels in heaven. So it could either be a reminder to women to bear in mind that the fallen angels fell because they were not submissive to authority. Or it could mean “A woman should wear a covering on her head as a sign that she is under man’s authority – a fact for all the angels (in heaven) to notice and rejoice in” (as The Living Bible paraphrases that verse).1 Corinthians 11:16 says that every church that is a church of God, will insist on this head covering for women when they pray or prophesy. The Holy Spirit recognized that 20 centuries later this would become a controversial issue; and so He made Paul to state (in this same verse) that if anyone was going to be argumentative about this matter, he would not argue with such a person. He would just allow that person to continue on in his/her disobedience and inconsistency.“If anyone is truly determined to do God’s will, he/she will definitely know whether this teaching is from God” (Jn.7:17).Those who have ears to hear, let them hear.Amen.
#ZacPoonen – For Those Who Have #Failed | #Inspirational
Like 👍 & Subscribe – @Ahava Jerusalem
#home #family #parents #children #sermon #JesusChrist #God #Faith #Hope #Love #sermon #God #Jesus #Christian #Future #people #ahavajerusalem #Truth #Bible #Peace #Kingdom #HolySpirit #overcominglife #worship #grace #mercy #future #eternity
More on: http://ahavajerusalem.orgThere are many brothers and sisters who feel that because they have sinned and failed God at some time in their past lives, therefore they cannot fulfill God’s perfect plan for their lives now.Let us look at what the Scriptures has to say on this matter, and not lean on our own understanding or our sense of logic.Notice first of all, how the Bible begins.In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth (Gen. 1:1). And the heavens and the earth must have been perfect when God created them, for nothing imperfect or incomplete can ever come forth from His hand.But some of the angels whom He had created fell away, and this is described for us in Isaiah 14:11-15 and Ezekiel 28:13-18. It was then that the earth came into the condition described in Gen. 1:2, “formless, empty and dark”The rest of Gen. 1 describes how God worked on that shapeless, empty, dark mass and made something so beautiful out of it that He Himself declared it to be “very good” (Gen. 1:31). We read in Genesis 1:2, 3 that the Spirit of God moved over the earth, and God spoke His Word – and this was what made the difference.What is the message in that for us today?Just this that no matter how much we may have failed or how much we may have made a mess of things, God can still make something glorious out of our lives.God had a perfect plan for the heavens and the earth when he created them. But this plan had to be set aside because of Lucifer’s failure. But God remade the heavens and the earth and still produced something very good out of it.Now consider what happened next.God made Adam and Eve and started all over again. God must have had a perfect plan for them too, which obviously did not include their eating of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. But they did eat of the forbidden tree and frustrated God’s original plan for them – whatever the plan may have been.Logic would now tell us that they could not fulfill God’s perfect plan any longer. Yet we see that when God came to meet them in the garden, He does not tell them that they would now have to live only on His second best for the rest of their lives. No. He promises them in Genesis 3:15 that the seed of the woman would bruise the head of the serpent. That was a promise of Christ’s dying for the sins of the world and overcoming satan on Calvary.
More on: http://www.cfcindia.com/article/gods-perfect-plan-for-those-who-have-failed