Tag: Hillary

‘Wrong cloth?’ Report: Hillary’s bathroom server ‘wipe’ missed some spots

It certainly does:

File under: “Big if true.”

Oh, Hillary … you’re in trouble! At least you should be.

Not shocking, no. What it is is potentially damning. And also pretty good joke fodder:

Whoops!

Read more: http://twitchy.com/2016/01/21/wrong-cloth-report-hillarys-bathroom-server-wipe-missed-some-spots/

Unbelievable: Byron York notes ‘a Hillary classic on Benghazi’

http://twitter.com/#!/BigKahuna919191/status/476131233379143680

Byron York caught a gem in Hillary Clinton’s interview with Diane Sawyer of ABC News:

http://twitter.com/#!/ByronYork/status/476130103223939072

Unbelievable.

Accountability again takes a holiday!

http://twitter.com/#!/lrc328/status/476130819660996611 http://twitter.com/#!/merrillgmccarty/status/476137324086972419 http://twitter.com/#!/marcely034/status/476131000414515200 http://twitter.com/#!/FairTaxNancy/status/476136100251987968

The answers to those last questions remain very unclear.

***

Related:

Shameless: Hillary Clinton claims Benghazi security cables never came to her attention

‘Dude!’ Team Hillary reportedly hires Tommy Vietor for Benghazi spin control — yes, that dude

Read more: http://twitchy.com/2014/06/09/unbelievable-byron-york-notes-a-hillary-classic-on-benghazi/

Sputtering media’s hypocrisy on Hillary’s age grabbed in damning juxtaposition [pic]

http://twitter.com/#!/exjon/status/456935760566837248

The aging process: normally it takes location towards most readily useful men and women — as well as the worst folks.

Nevertheless should you too declare that Hillary Clinton’s you will forget a springtime chicken, you’d better be prepared the lady followers in development to bare his or her teeth. That’s actually recently been the situation for RedState’s Erick Erickson, which’d the neurologic to point that Hillary will is a somewhat old POTUS:

It must never be a discussion. Yesterday, doing for rivals Limbaugh, we noted that Hillary Clinton is old by 2016. She’ll, certainly, be 69. We is clearly perhaps not speaing frankly about tortoises right here or redwood woodlands. Sixty-nine is certainly not much longer middle-age. Its just a normal truth.

But the fact is inconvenient for lefties. Specially when that facts are because an Untouchable like Hillary. Just ask HuffPo aspect and regular Banter control editor Bob Cesca:

http://twitter.com/#!/bobcesca_go/status/458705954221993984

Cesca writes:

Yes, Hillary Clinton modifications 69 a matter-of regular or more before Election Day 2016. What exactly are? Supplying she’s let me make it clear and mentally capable handle the duty, which in fact cares exactly how old she’ll be? Might resemble a weak destination to use this as ammo against work prospect. But, sadly, it’s just the start of quick and easy not-so-subtle anti-Hillary misogyny we’ll be reading for foreseeable future.

Remark on Hillary’s age so you’re right-away a misogynist. Make an account from a Republican’s high-level age, plus it also’s “real journalism.”

http://twitter.com/#!/JGreenDC/status/458714949913964544

In fact, he done:

http://twitter.com/#!/JohnEkdahl/status/458716510056247296

From Cesca’s HuffPo piece:

Explanation another, plus significantly: Senator McCain is clearly dropping his shpadoinkle. As he admitted he doesn’t knowledge many domiciles he together with his heiress fan individual, it could not need been because he is got a lot of houses to count. Instead, possibly he simply couldn’t remember how many homes he’s got. … To put it really, Senator McCain is showing signs to be too-old with regards to gig, together with his existing history of forgetting things (whether effortless details like standard of domiciles he’s got, or more complicated realities like Sunni vs. Shia) medicine availability of some genuine about anxiety when you look at the Republican construction.

Huh. Old and senile? Only image Cesca is the right worser person globally! Like Matt Yglesias:

http://twitter.com/#!/JimmyPrinceton/status/351160953519341568

What exactly are does he comprehend? Truly, he understands John McCain is old:

http://twitter.com/#!/mattyglesias/status/961490178

Why John McCain reasonable game on the web, but Hillary’s off-limits?

http://twitter.com/#!/seanagnew/status/458761307643465728

To sum up: hypocrisy.

http://twitter.com/#!/AsheSchow/status/458689629206904833 http://twitter.com/#!/hale_razor/status/457274772477317120

Liberals, like every person, have truly old. They’re perhaps not protected throughout time:

http://twitter.com/#!/RBPundit/status/457182032809181185

And Hillary won’t be resistant from critique.

http://twitter.com/#!/Matthops82/status/458760823432019968

***

Relevant:

‘Age and sexual activity discrimination’: Drudge Report blasted for ‘Grandma Hillary’ header

Get more info: http://twitchy.com/2014/04/23/sputtering-medias-hypocrisy-on-hillarys-age-captured-in-damning-juxtaposition-pic/

Don’t miss the NY Post cover that Greta Van Susteren calls a ‘sizzler’ [photo]

http://twitter.com/#!/JayCaruso/status/498850981770432512

Giggling madly. What happened to spark that? Oh, just this:

http://twitter.com/#!/gretawire/status/498798367745777664

Sizzler, but a total fail!

http://twitter.com/#!/Cameron_Gray/status/498794919457456128

And an excellent question:

http://twitter.com/#!/Cameron_Gray/status/498811648988413953

Boom.

While hilarious and true, it seems Hillary Clinton forgot about a little something.

http://twitter.com/#!/WildBill4701/status/498767770507812864 http://twitter.com/#!/ArchieMustard/status/498851312818077696

But, hey, what difference does that make, right?

Related:

Twitchy coverage of Hillary Clinton

Read more: http://twitchy.com/2014/08/11/does-it-make-hillary-a-racist-dont-miss-the-ny-post-cover-that-greta-van-susteren-calls-a-sizzler-photo/

‘The victim’: Who cares that Hillary defended an accused rapist in 1975?

http://twitter.com/#!/Slate/status/478995515364089856

The effort to clear the decks for Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign continues. Now we learn that Clinton defended an accused rapist in 1975.

“Who cares?” asks Slate in a tweet today. Take the click bait and you’ll wind up at an article by Amanda Marcotte headlined, “It Shouldn’t Matter That Hillary Clinton Defended an Accused Rapist in 1975.” Does Marcotte make the case?

It turns out there’s a difference between “Should it matter?” and “Who cares?”

http://twitter.com/#!/psherm07/status/478998754234994689 http://twitter.com/#!/gypsyluc/status/478997437063778304

The Washington Free Beacon was able to dig up the tapes of an early ’80s interview for Esquire magazine in which Hillary laughs when questioned about the case.

http://twitter.com/#!/Tark31/status/478997654844612609 http://twitter.com/#!/Tark31/status/478997258654859266 http://twitter.com/#!/Matthops82/status/478999975196504064 http://twitter.com/#!/Matthops82/status/478997082838024192 http://twitter.com/#!/chelseagrunwald/status/478996586073047041 http://twitter.com/#!/JohnG405/status/478997897531248640 http://twitter.com/#!/rockmom/status/479003581526581248 http://twitter.com/#!/DanRiehl/status/478394311084888065 http://twitter.com/#!/ConservativeLA/status/478999358436687872

 

Read more: http://twitchy.com/2014/06/17/the-victim-probably-who-cares-that-hillary-defended-an-accused-rapist-in-1975/