New York Observer Stands By Journalist Who Smeared Kremlin Foes

Mikhail Klikushin has written several stories for the paper, all of which fall in line with Russian government propaganda points.

The New York Observer is standing by a reporter who has written more than a dozen articles for the outlet with a slavishly pro-Kremlin bent, the most recent a story with no sources that blames the murder of opposition leader Boris Nemtsov on his love life.

The reporter, Mikhail Klikushin, has written 15 articles for the outlet since November 2014, according to the Observer‘s website. He has no online presence — in English or Russian — beyond the stories he has written for the Observer, which have also been picked up by other outlets. A Nexis search turns up no public record of Klikushin.

“He’s a writer,” Observer Editor-in-Chief Ken Kurson told BuzzFeed News. “He lives in the tristate area. He’s a Russian national who has been in America for at least 10 years or so.” Klikushin’s contact information is impossible to find online. He declined a request, issued via Kurson, to speak to BuzzFeed News.

Kurson said Klikushin is a freelancer and was paid for his articles. He says he has met the writer face-to-face.

He stood by Klikushin’s articles and said, “I have probably edited about half of them myself.”

“We try to publish compelling content that people want to read,” he added.

Klikushin’s 15 articles are remarkable in how directly they line up with pro-Russian propaganda points. The Kremlin regularly issues talking points, either via official statements or, more often, by reports in state-run or Kremlin-friendly media.

A little over one day after Nemtsov was gunned down in central Moscow, the Observer ran an article by Klikushin speculating that the slain opposition’s leader’s “tangled love life” was behind his murder. That line was floated by Kremlin-owned Russia Today as well as Life News, an outlet with very close ties to Russia’s security services, in the hours following Nemtsov’s murder. LifeNews headlined its story: “Nemtsov may have been avenged for an abortion done by his lover.” Neither outlet is considered trustworthy or respectable because of their overt ties and politicization. Automized Russian bots on Twitter, meanwhile, spammed the network with identical tweets saying: “Nemtsov was killed because of the jealousy of some Ukrainian (apparently he stole the girlfriend of some Ukrainian),.”

By Monday, Nemtsov’s girlfriend — the target of Klikushin’s story — had become a major figure in Russia as it deals with the aftermath of Nemtsov’s murder. Anna Duritskaya, a model from Ukraine, appeared visibly shaken in an interview with the Russian TV channel Dozhd. The Russian authorities have barred her from leaving the country. On Monday evening, the Russian newspaper Izvestiya, which the Kremlin often uses to plant stories, cited unnamed sources in the investigation as saying that the Ukrainian security sources were behind Nemtsov’s murder.

Russia has invested heavily in spreading its propaganda. In the English-language world that is done mainly through outlets like Russia Today and the new website Sputnik. But there are also smaller projects without obvious direct links to the Kremlin. New websites like Russia Insider insist they are private initiatives.

A recent report called “The Menace of Unreality: How the Kremlin Weaponizes Information, Culture and Money” shows the varied ways in which Russia ensures its propaganda finds a home in the West. Its methods run the gamut from the blunt to the nuanced and refined. The subject of Russian propaganda has shot to the forefront of discussions — both in the U.S. and in Europe — since the outbreak of war and revolution in Ukraine, where Russia has deployed its multiple media assets to paint the new Ukrainian government as “Nazis.”

Stories in the Western press often make it into the discussion back home in Russia. Klikushin’s stories are regularly translated into Russian — it is unclear by whom –and then circulated on obscure news sites, blogs, and beyond. In this case, a commenter uses a translation of Klikushin’s story in “the American newspaper New York Observer” to dispute a post on the website of opposition radio station Ekho Moskvy. A post on a different website links to Klikushin’s story and asks, “Have they started to see the truth about Ukraine in New York?”

Other articles written by Klikushin target the Kremlin’s favorite bugbears: State Department spokesperson Jen Psaki, former Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili, as well as the presidents of Lithuania and Estonia and Latvian politicians. Klikushin also focuses on Ukraine, with one article headlined “The New Ukraine Is Run by Rogues, Sexpots, Warlords, Lunatics and Oligarchs.”

Read more: http://www.buzzfeed.com/miriamelder/new-york-observer-stands-by-journalist-who-smeared-kremlin-f

Jake Gyllenhaal just endorsed Mitt Romney … Or did he? Update: Probably not

http://twitter.com/#!/Jake_Gyllenhaal/status/257932532828471296

The Drudge Report is reporting that actor Jake Gyllenhaal endorsed Republican nominee Mitt Romney for President this evening:

Actor Jake Gyllenhaal endorses Romney… drudge.tw/QjVaX3

— DRUDGE REPORT (@DRUDGE_REPORT) October 16, 2012

If true, this is a big story.  But is the tweet really from Jake Gyllenhaal’s Twitter account? The account only has 10,289 followers and isn’t verified.

Twitchy will monitor the story and will update this post as soon as we find out more information.

Update: As of 8:56 pm ET, the story has been removed from The Drudge Report.

Sorry, Republicans, but this almost certainly is not a bona fide Jake Gyllenhaal account.

Update: Romney supporters continue to post jubilant tweets. They are going to be disappointed when they find out the truth:

Jake_ Gyllenhaal THANK YOU for endorsing #MittRomney!!!!

— SHIRLEY RAMSEY (@RAMSEYHOUSE) October 16, 2012

@jake_gyllenhaal Way to be an independent thinker..see the state of disrepair our country is in, and vote on information not ideology

— Sarah Morey (@SarahMorey) October 16, 2012

@jake_gyllenhaal Thank you Jake! That takes guts in Hollywood!

— PaulaCarvin (@paula_carvin) October 16, 2012

@jake_gyllenhaal I’m sure ur garnering heat for that remark. Hubby was just sayin the “class” has gone out of Hollywood. Ur bringin it back

— Stephanie (@Catnblue) October 16, 2012

WOW, @jake_gyllenhaal has endorsed Mitt Romney. How awesome is that?

— Bryan Thomas (@bthockey) October 16, 2012

Update: Twitter has suspended the account.

Read more: http://twitchy.com/2012/10/15/jake-gyllenhaal-just-endorsed-mitt-romney-or-did-he/

“Mr. Cub,” Chicago Baseball Legend Ernie Banks, Dies At 83

Banks was a legendary home run hitter and the first black baseball player on the Chicago Cubs.

Chicago Cubs infielder Ernie Banks is pictured in 1967. (AP Photo/Harold Filan) AP

Ernie Banks, a legendary home run hitter and the first black baseball player on the Chicago Cubs, died Friday.


Banks joined the Cubs in 1953 and went on to earn the nickname “Mr. Cub.” His career was marked by an array of successes over 19 seasons: he hit 512 home runs and 1,636 RBIs; he was an 11-time all star; and in 1977, he was inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame.

Banks still holds Cubs records for the number games played and at-bats, among other things, ESPN reported. He also still holds the record for the second most home runs in Cubs history.

Ernie Banks connects with the ball for his 2,500th base hit of his major league career on Sept. 19, 1969, in Chicago. AP

As the first black player on the Cubs, Banks was also a pioneer at a time when Baseball was still a predominately white sport.


Prior to joining the MLB, he played in the Negro leagues, joining the Kansas City Monarchs in 1950. He later spent two years in the army before joining the Cubs.

Chicago Cubs Hall of Fame slugger Ernie Banks in March 2014. M. Spencer Green / AP

Banks grew to become a beloved figure in Chicago and elsewhere.


Among other things, he was known for his “sunny disposition,” the Chicago Tribune reported Friday. In 2013, he received the Presidential Medal of Freedom from President Obama.

Banks’ death was confirmed by his wife and the Cubs.

Willie Mays, right, of the New York Giants sprints to third base as Banks catches a ball in Chicago on May 22, 1957. Harry Hall / AP

Chicago’s Wrigley Field displayed a tribute to Banks Friday on its marquee:

The Wrigley Field marquee pays tribute to Mr. Cub on this somber night.

— MLB (@MLB)

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel posted a tribute to Banks on Facebook calling him “one of Chicago’s greatest ambassadors.”


Ernie Banks was more than a baseball player. He was one of Chicago’s greatest ambassadors. He loved this city as much as he loved — and lived for — the game of baseball. This year, during every Cubs game, you can bet that No.14 will be watching over his team. And if we’re lucky, it’ll be a beautiful day for not just one ballgame, but two. My deepest sympathy to his wife, Liz, family, and friends.

Fans took to social media Friday to mourn Banks’ death, many of them using his catchphrase, “Let’s Play Two.”

So long, Ernie. I never met you, but the excitement and positivity you brought to the game was unparalleled. #ErnieBanks #LetsPlayTwo

— JimIngram01 (@Jim Ingram)

Grew up in the days of WGN & TBS hearing of legends Henry Aaron and Mr. Cub Ernie Banks, sad to hear of his passing. RIP #MrCub

— hates_sleeves (@Jesse)

Truly saddened to hear about the death of #ErnieBanks, but happy he’s playing ball upstairs with Ronnie 💞 #GoCubsGo

— BF_StarNews (@Brittany Feagans)

Welcome to the Field of Dreams, Mr. Cub. #LetsPlay2

— LukeMock (@Luke Mock âš¾)

Cap off to a legend… Ernie Banks. #letsplaytwo

— nickjoness (@Nick Jones)

Read more: http://www.buzzfeed.com/jimdalrympleii/mr-cub-chicago-baseball-legend-ernie-banks-dies-at-83

Richard Armitage Reading Love Poems Will Give You An Eargasm

Relationship status: Richard Armitage saying “bud”.

1. Richard Armitage, star of The Hobbit, North and South, Robin Hood and your sexual fantasies, has narrated a book of love poems and it’s about the best thing you’ll ever put in your ears.

 

2. Feast your aural senses on Armitage’s version of “I Carry Your Heart” by e. e. cummings.

[soundcloud url=”https://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/189530593″]

DAT “BUD” THO.

4. And for further listening pleasure, here’s Armitage doing “Bright Star” by John Keats.

[soundcloud url=”https://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/189530112″]

Swoon. To. Death.

6. AND WHAT ABOUT ARMITAGE DOING SHAKESPEARE CAN YOUR EARS EVEN HANDLE IT?!?!?!

[soundcloud url=”https://api.soundcloud.com/tracks/189529070″]

Dead. Literally dead.

8. You can download the whole audiobook of 15 poems for free on Audible Australia right now (or Audible US here).

Read more: http://www.buzzfeed.com/jennaguillaume/richard-armitage-eargasm

The Power and Terror of Claire Underwood’s Hair

Claire Underwood’s hair holds all the secrets of the White House. Spoilers abound.

Nathaniel E Bell / Via Netflix

(Before you begin, I’m warning you there are third season spoilers ahead. You’ve been sufficiently warned.)

There are particular movements you may do without noticing, thousands of times in your life. Tucking hair behind your ear, twirling a strand while you write, blowing it out of your face while you move. The run, the twirl, the pull. We negotiate dead strands with living fingers, pampering and twisting, brushing, the comb. A drastic haircut in times of change, a dye job for rebellion. There is something freeing about watching all your hair fall to the floor around you to the hum of a clipper or the slice of a scissor — metaphorically and physically, everything is gone. The wind is at your neck, now move.

That cutthroat efficiency is why so many professional women choose the crop, and it’s likely part of the reason behind Claire Underwood’s on House of Cards. Can you imagine her with a perpetually blown-out sea of hair? She has, instead, the corporate mom cut: the cutthroat sister of the soccer mom, unconnected to the Rachel, and only distantly related to the manic pixie dream girl the way humans are related to Hades in hell. Since the beginning of the series, her look has been ambiguous: short but not unstylish, capable and cool. It is a constant in the series the way the balance of power is not. It shifts only slightly to suit occasions — a swirl for a ball, something butch when the occasion may call. But never anything too drastic, and nothing noticeable, or worse: distracting.

David Giesbrecht / Via Netflix

She is, for the first two seasons, the quiet doom of the show, her feelings iced over to protect her and her own. In fact, the only time you really see her fret about her hair for most of the series is Season 2: a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it breakdown on the stairs. And even then, she pats her hair like she’s clamping down her emotions — a knot in her throat and then she’s gone. Later in that episode, Claire’s seen rowing in her bedroom, shown from the back of her head: steady pace, not a hair out of place, dark hair growing at the roots, fading up to the frost. If Mellie is the Southern hospitality first lady on Scandal, with big hair full of secrets and rage and grief, Underwood is the chill of the Capitol’s halls. There’s nothing to see here, carry on.

On so many other shows, there’s a conscious unspoken maintenance of traditional womanhood — even in the direst of times, a girl’s gotta have a blowout. The maintenance of a woman is just par for the course of television, or has been for too long. (It is not the case with Shondaland, but that is another think piece, for another time.) The perpetual blowout, though, is not for Claire Underwood. She has no length of hair that needs it. She is kept, yes, always, but not because she has a secret team of hairstylists living at home to plot with, but because she’s cultivated a life so slim and brutally self-determined it’s not necessary. She can get up and go, quietly and whenever she decides is the perfect time. When she does decide to move, it’s with the silent death an iceberg is to a ship off course. You don’t see it coming until it hits you. The foundation of her character, actually, is being this kind of inevitable, unmoving force. David Fincher gave Robin Wright this single directive about the Claire he wanted to see on the screen: “Don’t move. Don’t move. Claire is a bust.”

Via Netflix

In Season 3, all of this shifts rapidly — both her cool facade and her hair, too. Claire Underwood has a heart now, and it makes her visibly sick. She hovers over the kitchen sink after asking for help from Francis. She wears more silks now, soft fabrics for a softer, unsure woman she’s never been before. For so long, we saw her as this stalwart, inevitable force. Now we see her fidgeting: hands always in the air, or trying to go for a run — pacing, or glancing, isolated from Francis where before she had always been luxuriously, wholly, alone.

We see her stumbling to find her own power as U.N. ambassador and use the discomfiture of being a woman to get it: We see her fixing her makeup while negotiating with the Russian ambassador. We see her peeing and talking coolly to him about the president at the same time. And later, we see her too, discussing hair color and voter preference with the presidential campaign staff. “Iowa voters love the blonde,” an advisor says, and Claire takes a moment to mourn her freshly brunette locks, before returning to her ice blonde. It’s not entirely blonde, though — the roots at the neck are deep brunette, like she couldn’t quite let them go. The unspoken efficiency of her appearance in the past few seasons has shifted into a conscious, calculated power move in a way it hadn’t been before. Her power isn’t really hers now, not anymore. Before, she was an iceberg, a marble bust, half of the atom bomb of the Underwood duo. But now, not so much.

In the final episodes of the latest season, Claire’s hair becomes frenetically colored: her hair color changes from brunette to icy blonde, to streaked and highlighted sand, as if it can’t quite decide when to stop. She’s come undone. She’s walked out on Francis, wind at her neck. Time to run.

Read more: http://www.buzzfeed.com/arabellesicardi/the-hair-warfare-on-house-of-cards

USA vs Germany at the World Cup: Prepare for World War Pun

http://twitter.com/#!/blabberson/status/482007226974875649

That’s sage advice.

http://twitter.com/#!/jwoodham/status/481996745153314816

We’re thinking it’s too late already.

http://twitter.com/#!/ChrisNHarrelson/status/482001898208501760 http://twitter.com/#!/the_moviebob/status/481916926315495424

The way I look at it: WWI: USA def. Germany WWII: USA def. Germany World Cup: Why would anything change? #3-0 #undefeated #USAGER— Derek Limbaugh (@DerekLimbaugh14) June 25, 2014

http://twitter.com/#!/rtking10/status/482000622128877568 http://twitter.com/#!/screwyoumegn/status/482007501026893824 http://twitter.com/#!/Shanehasabeard/status/482004019146010624 http://twitter.com/#!/silverkranch/status/482010613585965056

Groan.

 

 

Read more: http://twitchy.com/2014/06/26/usa-vs-germany-at-the-world-cup-prepare-for-world-war-pun/