http://twitter.com/#!/pbsgwen/status/324569697272086530
Oh, here comes the good old race card! As Twitchy reported, CNN broke the news that a suspect in the Boston Marathon bombing has been identified. John King reported it was a “dark-skinned” male. Cue the outrage!
CNN describes suspect as “dark skinned male.” Progs going nuts over description.
— Michelle Malkin (@michellemalkin) April 17, 2013
Yep. It wasn’t just the predictable Gwen Ifill. King was also on the receiving end of some freak-outs because he said he wouldn’t give further information so as to not “inflame tensions.”
John King sayswont give more information about suspect not to inflame tensions doubt he would say that if dealing with a conservative
— In G-d We Trust (@conservative013) April 17, 2013
Huh. But, here come the lib freak-outs.
Heh, now @cnn (specifically @johnkingcnn) wants to pull back and not “inflame tensions” cc: @aceofspadeshq
— tsrblke (@tsrblke) April 17, 2013
Hm…..”Dark skinned male” says a lot already, John King, who says he won’t release more info for fear of “raising tensions”
— Alex Kane (@alexbkane) April 17, 2013
You don’t want to cause offense and further inflame tensions but you don’t have a problem with mentioning he’s “dark skinned.” Re: John King
— Andrew (@metsfanapk) April 17, 2013
Yeah, #thanks so much John King for not “inflaming tensions” by saying only that a dark-skinned male is responsible & giving no add’l info.
— Erica L (@infinitehope23) April 17, 2013
As Twitchy reported, Salon’s David Sirota is hardest hit. Remember, he hoped the bomber was a “white guy.“
“dark-skinned male” – John King, CNN (@davidsirota hardest hit)
— Sean Agnew (@seanagnew) April 17, 2013
Hear that popping noise? Libs heads exploding over #CNN‘s description of “dark skinned individual.” cc:@davidsirota
— ★♥ Harriet Baldwin(@HarrietBaldwin) April 17, 2013
Sirota wasn’t alone.
guess what! he ain’t a dark skinned foreigner! (at least the pics i saw) #MentallyChallenged
— Zafar Khudayberdiev (@bianconerifan) April 17, 2013
People are cooked anything other than “white” could be worded as “Dark skinned” that doesn’t mean BLACK! Smdh
— Chericee.H (@ChericeeH) April 17, 2013
#Bostonbombing suspect a “dark-skinned male”. #CNN, why would you say that? You’ve unleashed the hounds of hell. #foxnews
— Bonnie Greer (@Bonn1eGreer) April 17, 2013
I feel like counting the number of times #CNN uses “dark-skinned male.” I’m so over polarizing and insensitive language in the media.
— Kailey Latham (@KaileyLatham) April 17, 2013
Great. Possible Boston bombing suspect identified only as “dark skinned”. Could you vague&racist that up a bit?
— Nicole (@TheNicoleWitte) April 17, 2013
#NeverForget RT @lesismore82 Cuz we all know Boston doesn’t take too kindly to Dark skinned people
— Nicky Flash (@milesfan79) April 17, 2013
Yeah, “dark-skinned individual” is not at all vague and devoid of anything but fuel for terrible posts to online comment sections
— Mike Radoslav (@MikeRadoslav) April 17, 2013
Here is an idea, libs. Why not be happy that the case is moving forward and justice may be served? But, then, that doesn’t serve your grievance-mongering, does it?
Read more: http://twitchy.com/2013/04/17/sirota-not-alone-boston-bombing-suspect-idd-as-dark-skinned-male-gwen-ifill-libs-go-nuts/
