
Read more: http://www.ifunny.com//pictures/you-seem-have-forgotten/
@sallykohn With every tweet Sally makes she steps deeper and deeper in it— mymanjaco (@smartbassist) May 3, 2017
Sally Kohn really doesn’t like Ivanka Trump. It’s just too bad she can’t find a more convincing way to make her case:
Ivanka Trump is definitely a successful woman, but her success comes with a GIANT asterisk that she was set up to succeed at birth— Sally Kohn (@sallykohn) May 3, 2017
Pssst, Sally! If you’re gonna go there, you’d better be prepared to go all the way:
@sallykohn I'm sure Chelsea can relate……..— Yoop (@_Yoop1) May 3, 2017
@LOREinFlorida @sallykohn Same exact thing could be said about Chelsea— DanR 5.56 (@CaptParker1775) May 3, 2017
@sallykohn You mean like @ChelseaClinton ?— Liberty Never Sleeps (@LotusTom) May 3, 2017
@sallykohn Now do it for Chelsea Clinton! So cool!— Nightwood (@Shteina_Gott) May 3, 2017
Great. Do Chelsea Clinton now. https://t.co/VwEWTOBCoj— Mo Mo (@molratty) May 3, 2017
Now do Chelsea Clinton. https://t.co/kPXZXLESrB— Heather (@hboulware) May 3, 2017
You misspelled Chelsea Clinton. https://t.co/s4OMYsqfxi— Randy Clemens (@bostonrandy) May 3, 2017
@sallykohn What about Chelsea's…..success, if you can call it that? Does that have an asterisk?— Heimish Conservative (@HeimishCon) May 3, 2017
googletag.cmd.push(function () { googletag.display(“div-gpt-300x250_1”); });
The House Rules Committee met today to prepare a resolution that would rebuke President Obama for arranging the prisoner swap of Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl for five Taliban prisoners. A vote on the resolution may take place as early as Tuesday.
http://twitter.com/#!/jrsalzman/status/509041290554519552The administration is required by law to notify Congress at least 30 days ahead of time before transferring prisoners housed at the Guantánamo Bay detention facility. President Obama said after the transfer took place that giving Congress a heads-up could have jeopardized the deal with the Taliban to free the American prisoner of war.
The resolution expresses “grave concern” that releasing the five senior Taliban commanders raised national security risks.
Additionally, it argues that the exchange harmed the administration’s working relationships with the legislative branch, stating that “these actions have burdened unnecessarily the trust and confidence in the commitment and ability of the Obama administration to constructively engage and work with Congress.”
http://twitter.com/#!/ChadPergram/status/509098028373127168 http://twitter.com/#!/conservbtfly/status/509119699922460672 http://twitter.com/#!/JohnFromCranber/status/509111808326893568 http://twitter.com/#!/Victoriaokane/status/509120202831712256* * *
Related:
‘Blimey’: Did WH think Bowe Bergdahl was ‘more important’ than James Foley?
‘Can it get any crazier?’ Bowe Bergdahl’s return to active duty stuns many
‘Better buy a cage’! Alleged deserter Bowe Bergdahl reportedly gets to go off base
‘Why did my son die?’ Father of soldier slain in Bergdahl search chokes up during testimony
‘So which is it?’ Hagel says Obama made ‘final decision’ on Bergdahl swap
‘The wheels on the bus’: CNN reports WH officials say SecDef Hagel made final call on Bergdahl trade
Code Pink, American Muslim Alliance welcome home Bowe Bergdahl

Read more: https://imgflip.com/i/5m55i
Well, well. It’s okay for someone on the Left to make a joke about people of the same sex marrying, but it’s not okay for a woman on the right to do so? Got it.
Hey people at #CrowleyJokes, how was Monica's joke much different than this? https://t.co/9Anr3ubA #hmmmm?
— RB (@RBPundit) April 26, 2012
Hmm. Curious, indeed!
The Left was once again caught spewing bile at a conservative woman when they took to Twitter to attack Fox News’ Monica Crowley for a joke she made about Sandra Fluke. Enter frantic back-pedaling and plausible deniability pushing. The ever-repugnant Salon editor Joan Walsh tries valiantly.
Note to the right: If you're not a homophobe, suggesting two men might marry isn't a gay joke. I know, I know, it's confusing.
— Joan Walsh (@joanwalsh) April 26, 2012
See? She can do it because she’s all inclusive and stuff. She’s a liberal! They are allowed to be homophobes and sexists and racists. And Monica must be a H8R. Because, Republican.
And what about Al Sharpton? “Punk faggot” is okay, evidently, if Al “blood on his hands” Sharpton says it.
Crowley once called an audience member a "punk faggot", too. http://t.co/7hJhT6yF #CrowleyJokes
— RB (@RBPundit) April 26, 2012
This doesn’t pass the homophobic smell test, Joan. Those who are saying that Monica Crowley used a “slur” as an excuse to spew their hate at her are the ones who are truly homophobic. Because, it’s only a slur if one considers being gay an insult. Hate much, Left?
Twitter agrees.
Those attacking @MonicaCrowley are probably the same ones who "insulted" @AndrewBreitbart by calling him gay. (It's not an insult, kids.)
— jon gabriel (@exjon) April 26, 2012
@red_red_head If liberals don't attack you for being a homophobe, they'll attack you for being a homosexual. #ludicrous
— jon gabriel (@exjon) April 26, 2012
Also sexist. Like the time President Obama felt the need to telephone Sandra Fluke to soothe her boo-boo feelings. The only thing he left out was a pat on the head.
Note: If you think women, gays, [fill in the blank], need to be treated like Fabergé eggs, you have an insultingly low opinion of them.
— jon gabriel (@exjon) April 26, 2012
Another false narrative debunked. Thank you, happy warriors!
It's seems I've killed the #CrowleyJokes hashtag by pointing out Joan Walsh's tweet and Al Sharpton's past comments. OH WELL!
— RB (@RBPundit) April 26, 2012
Dude. Dude:
http://twitter.com/#!/DD_MarySell/status/433368741066194944That happened yesterday in Alabama.
http://twitter.com/#!/DD_MarySell/status/433370531711045633OK, maybe we’re jumping the gun a little. Let’s give Holmes a chance to clarify his remarks:
http://twitter.com/#!/TLockette_Star/status/433376144625131520Oh.
http://twitter.com/#!/TLockette_Star/status/433380197807570944Yeah, that really doesn’t make him look any better.
http://twitter.com/#!/TheDaleJackson/status/433692126359330816So, for those keeping score at home, a Democratic politician admitted to making up crap and smearing Justice Clarence Thomas as an Uncle Tom.
http://twitter.com/#!/Heminator/status/433686466636828672 http://twitter.com/#!/PeteWadeinIndy/status/433695395797925888 http://twitter.com/#!/moelane/status/433687590341210112That seems pretty newsworthy to us. Wouldn’t you agree?
Damned racist repub… Wait, what? MT @tahDeetz: Southern democrats railing against interracial marriage.
What's old is new. #tcot #p2— Ken Brown (@K_P_Brown) February 12, 2014
http://twitter.com/#!/Harold_Benton/status/433688593064681472Exactly.
So why didn’t we hear about it right after it happened? Didn’t the MSM think it was worth covering?
http://twitter.com/#!/Will_Antonin/status/433688345768890368 http://twitter.com/#!/TheDaleJackson/status/433688812410396672 http://twitter.com/#!/NoahCRothman/status/433689026730930176This one certainly wasn’t thoroughly vetted — by the public or the mainstream media.
http://twitter.com/#!/TheDaleJackson/status/433689409821876224Editor’s note: This post has been updated with additional tweets.
Read more: http://twitchy.com/2014/02/12/holmes-thomas/

Read more: https://imgflip.com/i/tuit9