
Read more: https://imgflip.com/i/bnoas

Read more: https://imgflip.com/i/bnoas
That’s Dr. Judy Melinek, forensic pathologist and author of “Working Stiff: Two Years, 262 Bodies, and the Making of a Medical Examiner,” expressing her thanks to the Daily Kos. Why? Melinek was interviewed by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch on the autopsy of Michael Brown and now disputes how she was quoted, an assertion defended at length by the Daily Kos.
On her blog, Melinek explains:
A reporter from the St. Louis Post-Dispatch called me earlier this week, saying she had Michael Brown’s official autopsy report as prepared by the St. Louis County Medical Examiner, and asking me if I would examine and analyze it from the perspective of a forensic pathologist with no official involvement in the Ferguson, Missouri shooting death. I read the report, and spent half an hour on the phone with the reporter explaining Michael Brown’s autopsy report line-by-line, and I told her not to quote me – but that I would send her quotes she could use in an e mail. The next morning, I found snippets of phrases from our conversation taken out of context in her article in the Post-Dispatch. These inaccurate and misleading quotes were picked up and disseminated by other journals, blogs, and websites.
In the Dispatch’s published story, reporters Christine Byers and Blythe Bernhard quote Melinek as saying that “If he [Michael Brown] has his hand near the gun when it goes off, he’s going for the officer’s gun.” Melinek disputes making any such conclusion, writing on her blog:
There’s a big difference between “The hand wound has gunpowder particles on microscopic examination, which suggests that it is a close-range wound. That means that Mr. Brown’s hand would have been close to the barrel of the gun” and “he’s going for the gun.”
I was very fortunate to have the opportunity to correct this, in my own words last night, when Lawrence O’Donnell invited me to appear as a guest on MSNBC.
There are other disputes between the two as well, but St. Louis Post-Dispatch reporter Blythe Bernhard is standing by what she wrote.
Bernhard seems to be losing this round with the public.
Melinek says she’s learned a couple of lessons from the experience.

Read more: https://imgflip.com/gif/67xx

Read more: https://imgflip.com/i/cf1iv

Read more: https://imgflip.com/i/93b1n
Rut roh. Looks like the former green jobs czar didn’t get the Obama administration’s latest “toeing the line” memo.
Just hours after Newark Mayor Cory Booker took to Twitter and “The Rachel Maddow Show” to walk back his blasphemous private equity remarks, Jones defended Booker’s right to speak his mind.
Silly Van. That’s not allowed. Now get back in the kitchen and make Obama a sammich. Extra arugula, please.
Could it be that Jones is the newest member of Team #FreeCoryBooker? Or is this an opportunistic play to score invites to a couple of prime time cable news shows this week?
Either way, Jones’ tweet left a few conservatives feeling a little out of sorts:
Yes, I gladly RTd Van Jones support for Cory Booker. Welcome to WAY on the other side of the Looking Glass.
— This Will Kill You (@stephenkruiser) May 22, 2012
wait…did i just RT in agreement with @vanjones68? what is Obama doing to this country?!
— Scott Kuhn (@scotters) May 22, 2012
Things you don’t say every day: we agree with Van Jones.
Read more: http://twitchy.com/2012/05/22/van-jones-free-cory-booker/

Read more: https://imgflip.com/i/c438x
as you deserve it hot and steamy.
Let’s be genuine right here, the phrase “moist” is NSFW.
Read more: http://www.buzzfeed.com/juliafurlan/ignition-remix-but-for-food

Read more: https://imgflip.com/i/a18yx

Read more: https://imgflip.com/gif/9pfu1