
Read more: https://imgflip.com/gif/2ojbc

Read more: https://imgflip.com/gif/2ojbc
A highly scientific* analysis. *Not scientific at all.
(According to three BuzzFeed Australia writers who are making this shit up because WHAT DOES LIFE EVEN MEAN ANYMORE WE WILL NEVER BE THE SAME AGAIN???!?!?!??!!)
Jenna: You see things for what they are. You’re not easily deceived and haven’t got time for bullshit. You’re no-nonsense and probably smarter than everyone else, lbr.
Stephanie: You’re a big fan of: 1) being right, 2) the Backstreet Boys, 3) being in the company of the greats, i.e., Mindy Kaling, Tinashe, Taylor Swift, Demi Lovato, and a gazillion other people who are correct.
Brad: If you see blue and black you are, on top of being a genius, also correct. You are to the point, stoic, and understanding. You have no time for the frivolous nature of “gold and white” lovers. The world is a real place, and you see things the way they *really* are.
Jenna: You’re imaginative and creative. You’re not bound by “reality” and know there’s more to things than meets the eye.
Stephanie: You believe it’s true, but you are probably tripping balls.
Brad: You’re wrong about a lot of things, but your headstrong nature sees you often convince people otherwise. For you, it’s all about attitude.
Jenna: IDK WTF is wrong with you? You should probably see a doctor about that.
Stephanie: This is a glamorous colour combination, and that is your approach to life. You see things the way you want to and that’s A-OK.
Brad: You like to take the good with the good, and won’t take bad news for an answer. You spend your days with a smile on your face. You’re definitely a *morning person*.
Jenna: You’re a natural diplomat, and try to see both sides of a problem before making a decision. In other words, you’re a fence-sitter.
Stephanie: TBH, you’re probably right and you understand the difference between gold and bronze, which is a virtue. You also know that this dress wouldn’t even make bronze in the fashion Olympics, because it sucks.
Brad: You take your time with things. Often, you’ll stare at a tree for hours on end, just thinking about its point in the universe. Is it a tree? What makes it a tree? If you stop calling it a tree, is it still a tree?
Jenna: You’re a dog.
Stephanie: Get off Instagram for two seconds and look at an unfiltered version of the dress pls.
Brad: You’re wrong. Just wrong. And you should go see a doctor.
Jenna: You like eating ice cream and being sad.
Stephanie: You’re incorrect. Seek help XOXO.
Brad: Congratulations, you’re sad. Cheer up a little bit, because blue and brown is a colour combo that has worked literally three times.
Jenna: You’re a dog.
Stephanie: Sorry about your life choices that have led you to this point.
Brad: You grew up reading comic books, pondering the world, and wishing you had superpowers. You don’t have superpowers.
Jenna: The dress put a spell on you and now it owns your soul.
Stephanie: If it changed colours, you legit just need to get your eyes tested. Colours don’t change.
Brad: You’re not afraid to experiment and try new things.
Jenna: You just had to be different, didn’t you?!?!
Stephanie: You’re a loner who sees the world in a different light than everyone else. This is probably because you’re wearing ’90s colour-tinted lenses or something.
Brad: You’re one of “those” people that just *has* to be different.

Read more: http://ifunny.com/pictures/nice-try-satan/
“Him insulting the presidency and siding with the Republicans and coming in to give that talk to a joint session, I think it smacks of politics.”
Progressive Caucus co-chairman Rep. Raul Grijalva Monday called Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s planned address to a joint session of Congress an “insult.”
The Democrat from Arizona has previously said he will not attend the speech.
“Him insulting the presidency and siding with the Republicans and coming in to give that talk to a joint session, I think it smacks of politics,” Grijalva said on Sirius XM’s The Agenda in a radio interview. “It smacks of convenience, his election is a week away in Israel. And I for one am not going to contribute to that insult. There’s a protocol and Mr. Boehner is not in charge of foreign policy for this nation. The president is in charge of that and whether you like Obama or not, that’s the process.”
Grijalva said “it’s up to every individual” to decide if they wanted to attend the speech.
“You’ve had colleagues like John Lewis, Mr. Conyers…I’ve heard of other names but I don’t want to use them because, uh, at least those two are public say, âI’m not attending.’ And I that’s an individual choice each member should make.”
“Personally, I’m not attending, for myself, and that’s not a Progressive Caucus position or are we whipping them to do that,” he added. “I think each member has to. I’ve felt the prime minister’s intrusion into 2012, in practically endorsing Romney in that election was again an interference in the internal politics of a nation.”
The congressman cited the protocol followed by the Pope to set up an address to Congress later this year as evidence Netanyhu was breaking protocol by speaking to Congress without the president’s approval.
“If it’s good enough for the pope it should be good enough for the prime minister.”
correction
This article originally gave the wrong state Grijalva represents in Congress. BF_STATIC.timequeue.push(function () { document.getElementById(“update_article_correction_time_4942738”).innerHTML = UI.dateFormat.get_formatted_date(‘2015-02-10 21:02:03 -0500’, ‘update’); });
Read more: http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/progressive-caucus-chair-netanyahu-speech-to-congress-an-ins
Today’s lesson in race card logic comes to us courtesy of Congressional Black Caucus chairman Emanuel Cleaver. Here’s how he reacted to Romney’s criticism of Obamacare while delivering a speech at the annual NAACP convention:
Rep Cleaver (D-MO) MSNBC: booing Romney on healthcare “inappropriate but predictable” & “he should never have gone there in the first place”
— Greg Giroux (@greggiroux) July 11, 2012
Video via The Washington Examiner:
Such is life under Obama’s post-racial presidency. Apparently a white candidate must never “go there” when speaking to a black audience about a black opponent’s policies. It’s okay to talk about Obamacare, just not to “this audience.”
Would Rep. Cleaver would prefer that Romney lie? Does he think black Americans need to be pandered to and spoon-fed liberal pablum instead of hearing what Romney’s candidacy is really about?
https://twitter.com/PollyCarbo/status/223075322516611073
Nothing racist about that. No siree.
Shorter Rep. Cleaver: Obama should not be criticized in front of the American people because of his skin color.
— joe warner (@jwarner180) July 11, 2012
Conservatives on Twitter tried to puzzle out how Rep. Cleaver’s logic might apply to other situations.
So I guess President Obama shouldn't criticize Romney in front a white audience in Ohio, right Rep. Cleaver? #StuckOnStupid
— Seth (@dcseth) July 11, 2012
According to Cleaver's logic, Obama shouldn't criticize Palin while speaking before women.
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) July 11, 2012
Rep. Cleaver must also believe that Obama can never criticize Romney in front of white voters. Right?
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) July 11, 2012
Obama shouldn't criticize obsesity in front of fat people.
— Ben Howe (@BenHowe) July 11, 2012
Can Obama criticize Romney in front of white audience? @secupp: Cleaver: Romney should not have criticized Obama in front of black audience.
— Brad Boll (@acoltfan) July 11, 2012
This tweet just might blow Rep. Cleaver’s mind.
Rep. Cleaver shouldn't criticize Romney criticizing Obama in front of a black audience in front of a white audience.
— Ben Howe (@BenHowe) July 11, 2012
Hey, Rep. Cleaver, we’ve got news for you:
@BenHowe Anybody who says the president shouldn't be criticized is obviously not well versed in history or the Constitution.
— This Will Kill You (@stephenkruiser) July 11, 2012

Read more: http://ifunny.com/pictures/couple-wins/

Read more: https://imgflip.com/gif/88hyn