Author: Leaman Ralph

Really sugar is shaky because it originates from a straight stick see the play is Granny yes Grandma plus new style luv MaryJane so listen (Granny Apple last years blue ribbon production winner AKA) I, I, I ain't on the right side of my house Jane something or the other is in my room: finally after an extermination Grannie speaks once more "let my (old man) Pacman step on it". See it is home on the range so solo as it be truity speaks got a problem it is your own. But alter scenario: Z/n time; narcotics I got that candy s.p.ee..d360 Bar itch its' and Mickey Mouse for the Sultan 7 1 4er well a hem a hem, it went early in the morning like a smack chanting sugar structure 7 -one 1 +eleven and 4 do an ate 'er 8 eight 'er? Well that aint nice. NARCO says do you know them numbers change (response) Yes it is a FiX they are MF's Ope yeah Ope Douglas is it. Surrounded by Alkaloid is both Mary and Grandma in an never ending circle of membership. French mandates declare put up their dukes... ZEN Pepsi can talk half Chocolate and your ole man Pacman down in Cuba posing as the worlds one and only Coffee Wizard "back 1:1" tis Coffee time... ||

‘Give it up, champ’: Matt Yglesias can’t dig their way to avoid it of ‘Sopranos’ Vox-hole

http://twitter.com/#!/BobbyBigWheel/status/504790726446964736

As Twitchy reported, these days, Vox published the big news that “Sopranos” creator David Chase verified that Tony Soprano didn’t perish inside finale. Annnnnnd they immediately ended up with egg on their face.

However for just what it’s well worth, Matt Yglesias is trying to perform interference:

http://twitter.com/#!/mattyglesias/status/504781190180896769

Oh, bless their li’l heart.

http://twitter.com/#!/deep_beige/status/504782546732077059

Vox: David Chase reveals exactly what occurred inside finale. Chase: No I didn’t Vox: It’s not for you to decide, shut-up.— John Ekdahl (@JohnEkdahl) August 28, 2014

It’s enjoyable to view Yglesias backpedal. It’s a lot more fun to call him out on it:

http://twitter.com/#!/seanmdav/status/504787190552227840 http://twitter.com/#!/seanagnew/status/504785317032132608 http://twitter.com/#!/GPollowitz/status/504783471924240386

Ha!

http://twitter.com/#!/hayesy316/status/504786672861454336 http://twitter.com/#!/JohnEkdahl/status/504784496731115520

Also funny.

http://twitter.com/#!/seanmdav/status/504785977010036736 http://twitter.com/#!/CuffyMeh/status/504786159462268928

Keep it up, Matt. We are able to always use a giggle fit!

http://twitter.com/#!/CaptYonah/status/504788094412136450

***

Associated:

Twitchy coverage of Matt Yglesias

Find out more: http://twitchy.com/2014/08/27/give-it-up-champ-matt-yglesias-cant-dig-his-way-out-of-sopranos-vox-hole/

Fail: Obama: ‘Step in right direction,’ ‘Don’t read too much into it’

http://twitter.com/#!/KurtSchlichter/status/221284305748500480

As Twitchy reported earlier, the White House pulled the old “don’t read too much into it” when talking about the latest jobs report. Oh, yeah, and they have used the same line thirty times in just the past 32 months. Someone needs to recalibrate that teleprompter!

Twitter users immediately, and deservedly, began to mock the phrase.

I didn't read too much into any one jobs report, but added together their starting to form a picture of suckitude.

— Frank J. Fleming (@IMAO_) July 6, 2012

#dontreadtoomuchintoit That african american unemployment is 14%.They'll vote for me anyway.

— Jeff Stengel (@JeffStengel) July 6, 2012

Don't read too much into one election.

— Josh Greenman (@joshgreenman) July 6, 2012

Don't read too much into any one Geithner tax return.

— Lachlan Markay (@lachlan) July 6, 2012

#DontReadTooMuch into that S&P downgrade.

— Cuffé (@CuffyMeh) July 6, 2012

"Don't read too much into my complete incompetence as a leader."

— Tiffany (@devotedbangel) July 6, 2012

#ObamaCampaignSlogans: “Don’t read too much into my first term.” http://t.co/FZ5JXRFR

— David L B (@dlb703) July 6, 2012

https://twitter.com/p_bruce/status/221295074795995138

https://twitter.com/MattCover/status/221292846718779394

RT @jimgeraghty: Obama's new reelection slogan: "Don't Read Too Much Into This First Term."

— WhiteHousePressCorps (@whpresscorps) July 6, 2012

Obama: don't read too much into the last 31 job reports, but please do read too much into events at Bain Capital after Romney left.

— John Hayward (@Doc_0) July 6, 2012

RT @LachlanMarkay: Don't read too much into any one Obamacare waiver.

— Daniel Wanke (@danielwanke) July 6, 2012

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!! RT @KevinWGlass: .@politicalmath Don't read too much into any one Obama statement.

— Daniel Wanke (@danielwanke) July 6, 2012

Me on November 7: Don't read too much into one election.

— Nathan Wurtzel (@NathanWurtzel) July 6, 2012

They also called out President Obama for his insanely out of touch “step in the right direction” remark.

@bccohan @rcmahoney Yeah yeah, step in the right direction, blah blah blah. Really? #doingjustfine

— Samantha Pfaff (@SamanthaPfaff) July 6, 2012

If Obama thinks this is "a step in the right direction" it means he's totally, hopelessly lost. #newGPS "@hale_razor: #StepInRightDirection"

— Tim Newport (@logic_101) July 6, 2012

A step back from the edge of the cliff would be a #stepintherightdirection. #Romney2012

— Justin (@theGrudgeRetort) July 6, 2012

#stepintherightdirection Firing Holder #tcot

— DanStlMo (@DanStlMo) July 6, 2012

This is a #StepInTheRightDirection, @BarackObama? I think you stepped in something, all right, because I can smell it from here.

— Chris Of Rights (@ChrisJBreisch) July 6, 2012

When you start to walk from the bow to the stern of the Titanic, you're taking a #StepInTheRightDirection

— Jonah Goldberg (@JonahNRO) July 6, 2012

The RNC was out in front with a rapid response.

Step in the right direction? No, champ. That will happen in November.

Read more: http://twitchy.com/2012/07/06/out-of-touch-obama-jobs-report-step-in-right-direction-dont-read-too-much-into-it-mockery-ensues/

Gawker takes sympathetic look at pedophiles; readers suggest #GawkersNextArticle

http://twitter.com/#!/kirstenpowers10/status/244543980593872896

Fox News analyst Kirsten Powers is only one of many who are “super troubled” by an article published yesterday by Gawker which takes a sympathetic look at pedophiles. And by “sympathetic,” we mean depraved.

I wrote this big piece about trying to find sympathy and new treatments for pedophiles. Check it out, maybe: http://t.co/Sf8yapFu #longreads

— Cord Jefferson (@cordjefferson) September 7, 2012

The morally bankrupt article, written by Gawker editor and self-described progressive Cord Jefferson, is titled “Born This Way: Sympathy and Science for Those Who Want to Have Sex with Children.” It begins with a graphic account of sex with a 7-year-old girl — not rape, not molestation, but “sex.” It ends with a plea for understanding of this particular “sexual orientation”:

The old adage is that the true mark of a society is how it treats the weakest in its ranks. Blacks, women, Latinos, gays and lesbians, and others are still in no way on wholly equal footing in America. But they’re also not nearly as lowly and cursed as men attracted to children. One imagines that if Jesus ever came to Earth, he’d embrace the poor, the blind, the lepers, and, yes, the pedophiles.

While the revolting article appears under Gawker’s “Science” banner, many are outraged by the overall tone of the piece, which forgoes use of the terms “rape” and “assault” with only two exceptions: when describing threats made against pedophiles; for example, “Outside of jail, it’s not uncommon for average citizens to harass and assault pedophiles.”

@cordjefferson A man can not "fall" for his 7 yr old niece.. Your article implies a child seduced a grown man. http://t.co/kyCGueCU

— Kirsten Powers (@KirstenPowers) September 8, 2012

@Cordjefferson Also, a man having sex with a 7-yr old girl is not a 'sexual relationship" — it's rape and molestation http://t.co/kyCGueCU

— Kirsten Powers (@KirstenPowers) September 8, 2012

Soft-pedaling child-rape: Why Gawker's pedophilia essay is poor journalism http://t.co/03Qwctzv

— The Atlantic (@TheAtlantic) September 7, 2012

Dang, @gawker. I disliked your rag when it attacked me and the FBI. But your latest opinion made me want to vomit. Pedophilia is not ok.

— Brandon Darby (@brandondarby) September 8, 2012

Next, @Gawker will be defending Rape as just a sexual orientation.

— AG (@AG_Conservative) September 8, 2012

So…@cordjefferson posted this piece of depraved intellectual excrement on @Gawker: http://t.co/koIgJwce. And u wonder why I hate people.

— This Will Kill You (@stephenkruiser) September 8, 2012

Just read the 'Sympathy for Pedophiles' article. I'm physically ill. Not going to link to it. But I would like to say: Fuck you, @Gawker.

— Kimberly C (@conkc2) September 8, 2012

Is anyone all that surprised @Gawker threw their lot in with pedophiles?

— Bob Owens (@bob_owens) September 8, 2012

So, what’s the point of trying to prove that pedophilia is just another sexual orientation with which one is born? “If this research proves to be correct,” writes Jefferson, “it should help shape both our public policy and our public attitude, so that we’re protecting kids while also protecting pedophiles from angry mobs, cellmates, and themselves.”

How long before they demand rights? Science: Born This Way: …Want to Have Sex with Children – @Gawker http://t.co/5bJpnP8W

— Tracy McCain (@tracy_mccain) September 8, 2012

https://twitter.com/ToddKincannon/status/244571117744959488

With no attempt to even hide its agenda, Gawker inspired the #GawkersNextArticle hashtag. Just how low can you lower the bar while keeping the progressive language highbrow?

#GawkersNextArticle Rapists Are Just Misunderstood

— Ai-Everything (@AiPolitics) September 8, 2012

#GawkersNextArticle How to Manufacture Your Own Rohypnol

— Chris Barnhart (@ChrisBarnhart) September 8, 2012

#GawkersNextArticle Snorting coke with your kids: How it improves the parent- child relationship.

— Thisgirlisright (@ThisGirlisRight) September 9, 2012

https://twitter.com/ToddKincannon/status/244599008293711873

#GawkersNextArticle Street Defecation: The Soft Side Of The Occupy "Movement."

— Imaumbn™ (@Imaumbn) September 9, 2012

#GawkersNextArticle Keep Getting Laid – Why Telling Your Partner-Of-The-Night About Your Deadly STD Is Morally Wrong

— Running Bare (@running_bare) September 9, 2012

#GawkersNextArticle Josef Mengele: Unsung Medical Pioneer

— BattleSwarm (@BattleSwarmBlog) September 9, 2012

#GawkersNextArticle Pol Pot-ential: The Overlooked Upside of the Khmer Rouge

— jon gabriel (@exjon) September 9, 2012

https://twitter.com/ToddKincannon/status/244601854502244352

Sad, but not at all hard to believe:

somewhere at gawker, they are reading the #GawkersNextArticle tweets and saying… Some of these are good ideas!

— Aaron Worthing (@AaronWorthing) September 9, 2012

Read more: http://twitchy.com/2012/09/08/gawker-article-takes-sympathetic-look-at-pedophiles-outraged-readers-suggest-gawkersnextarticle/