Read more: https://imgflip.com/gif/bafrv
The Smoothest
Author: Leaman Ralph
Really sugar is shaky because it originates from a straight stick see the play is Granny yes Grandma plus new style luv MaryJane so listen (Granny Apple last years blue ribbon production winner AKA) I, I, I ain't on the right side of my house Jane something or the other is in my room: finally after an extermination Grannie speaks once more "let my (old man) Pacman step on it". See it is home on the range so solo as it be truity speaks got a problem it is your own. But alter scenario: Z/n time; narcotics I got that candy s.p.ee..d360 Bar itch its' and Mickey Mouse for the Sultan 7 1 4er well a hem a hem, it went early in the morning like a smack chanting sugar structure 7 -one 1 +eleven and 4 do an ate 'er 8 eight 'er? Well that aint nice. NARCO says do you know them numbers change (response) Yes it is a FiX they are MF's Ope yeah Ope Douglas is it.
Surrounded by Alkaloid is both Mary and Grandma in an never ending circle of membership. French mandates declare put up their dukes... ZEN Pepsi can talk half Chocolate and your ole man Pacman down in Cuba posing as the worlds one and only Coffee Wizard "back 1:1" tis Coffee time... ||
Confession Bear
Read much more: https://imgflip.com/i/a9ahu
Does this shooting reaction sum up the clear difference between Left, Right?
http://twitter.com/#!/Helen47/status/525723458676609024
As Twitchy reported, there is awful news out of Washington state today. A shooting at Marysville-Pilchuck High School, with reports of multiple injuries. We join everyone in praying for the victims and all affected by this tragic shooting.
Does what happens after such tragedies show a clear difference between the Left and the Right? RedState contributor and head writer for Blaze TV’s “Dana,” Ben Howe thinks so.
The Left rushes to politicize each tragedy in order to further its gun-grabbing end. We’ve seen it time and time again. It’s not concern for the victims; if it was, they’d want people to be able to defend themselves or others.
Plus, that’s what suits their narrative.
And another difference:
Related:
Canadian Parliament on lockdown after reports of active shooter [photos]; Updated
‘Running towards danger’: Video captures intense moments inside Canadian Parliament
NBC News’ Mark Murray: O-care ‘opponents have actually only control of the airwaves’
http://twitter.com/#!/Matthops82/status/456084886231973888
Yeah … also bad that’s never ended him prior to.
NBC News’ senior political editor Mark Murray has noticed that Obamacare has actuallyn’t been faring particularly really into the public arena. So, this morning, he put-on his thinking cap to find out the reason why.
Here’s exactly what he developed:
http://twitter.com/#!/mmurraypolitics/status/456080951509274624 http://twitter.com/#!/mmurraypolitics/status/456081355668197376 http://twitter.com/#!/mmurraypolitics/status/456082550679953408“Unilateral control of the airwaves.” If anybody requires us, we’ll be over right here. Laughing hysterically.
http://twitter.com/#!/eriContrarian/status/456084515337687040It’s definitely a very good competitor.
http://twitter.com/#!/flyoverangel/status/456086231344881665 http://twitter.com/#!/michi83/status/456081657817477120 http://twitter.com/#!/RBPundit/status/456081881189339136 http://twitter.com/#!/shaner5000/status/456085574139392000 http://twitter.com/#!/OneTonTurtle/status/456089060474236928 http://twitter.com/#!/rdbrewer4/status/456086721604509696 http://twitter.com/#!/baldingschemer/status/456086956577792001Awww.
http://twitter.com/#!/NoahWehrman/status/456088552967651328Wonder if those caps fit over the blindfold and earplugs Murray has evidently already been wearing all of this time.
http://twitter.com/#!/eriContrarian/status/456085648818987008 http://twitter.com/#!/BecketAdams/status/456084822528888832 http://twitter.com/#!/OrwellForks/status/456086103108239360True tale. As well as the thing is, with or without “the airwaves,” it’s however painfully obvious towards the US individuals who Obamacare sucks.
http://twitter.com/#!/Artist_Angie/status/456089448892362752 http://twitter.com/#!/hboulware/status/456083679681339392 http://twitter.com/#!/atoka7/status/456094639628365824Really, to wince at his or her own stupidity, he’d need certainly to feel pity. Predicated on what we’ve seen from him so far, that’s not likely to happen any time in the future. But at the very least anything positive can still leave this:
http://twitter.com/#!/hboulware/status/456089667255795712And mockery, unlike Obamacare, is wonderful for the mind, body, and heart.
***
Relevant:
‘You tend to be a f*cking hack’: NBC lapdog beclowns himself; You dudes, Obama totally compromises!
Like an archive, child! Hey, news, time to fully stop spinning Obamacare catastrophe as a ‘glitch’?
‘Dumbest really tweet ever!’ NBC reporter compares Obama to wounded warrior Cory Remsburg
Hack-tastic beclowning redux! NBC’s Murray: What happens to GOP when O-care website fixed?
Find out more: http://twitchy.com/2014/04/15/cant-make-this-stuff-up-nbc-news-mark-murray-o-care-opponents-have-sole-control-over-the-airwaves/
It’s all about appropriate goal setting and managing expectations
Read more: https://imgflip.com/i/ag69e
Marie Harf: ‘We are not going to telegraph our plans, period’
http://twitter.com/#!/marieharf/status/511613592903614464
We posted yesterday on the “snippy” exchange between deputy spokesperson for the State Department, Marie Harf and Daily Beast reporter Josh Rogin, but Twitter wasn’t done commenting on the exchange.
As this administration has embraced telegraphing U.S. plans in advance — i.e., withdraw dates from Iraq and Afghanistan — users were a little confused by Harf’s strong statement that, “we are not going to telegraph our plans, period.”
And here are some of the responses calling her out on this “telegraph” nonsense:
@AnthonyBialy @JammieWF @marieharf @joshrogin "We are not going to telegraph our plans in advance, period." Uh, what do you call "no boots"?
— Joel Engel (@joelengel) September 15, 2014
@marieharf @joshrogin We never telegraph our intentions. We use the major networks silly. 👸👓
— Marie Harf (@MarieBarf) September 15, 2014
@marieharf @joshrogin because you tweet instead of telegraph now?
— psl (@SkePatt) September 15, 2014
Really?—> @marieharf Your exalted leader has no problem telling everyone what we 'won't be doing. What's the difference?
— Scott (@retiredfirecapt) September 15, 2014
Oh, and about Harf ending her declaration with “period”? Remember what happened the last time:
Oh, @marieharf, the last time anyone used "Period" on us, we lost our doctors, coverage. @joshrogin
— Sandy (@RightGlockMom) September 15, 2014
And let’s end with this:
How do you sleep at night? @marieharf @joshrogin
— Ryan B. Leslie (@RyanBLeslie) September 15, 2014
Good question, Ryan, good question.
Coldest Thing On Earth
Sen. DeMint slams Boehner: ‘His plan will destroy American jobs’
http://twitter.com/#!/JimDeMint/status/275962311334838274
Whoa! While Speaker Boehner snubbed Obama at White home getaway celebration, Senator DeMint is snubbing and slamming Speaker Boehner. Boehner had been already using some heat over purging conservatives from committees. Today, their financial cliff offer to Obama has been panned.
Boehner getting temperature from right, People in america for Prosperity on today’s cliff offer: “Sadly this plan actually leaves Conservatives desiring.”
— Luke Russert (@LukeRussert) December 4, 2012
Sen. DeMint wasted no time at all in joining the growing chorus against the offer.
GOP Sen. Jim DeMint on financial cliff: Boehner’s program “will destroy United states jobs.”
— Chris Moody (@Chris_Moody) December 4, 2012
Boehner’s $800 billion income tax hike will destroy American tasks & not lower our $16 trillion financial obligation by one cent,” DeMint -R (SC)
— Bryan Zingmark (@Better_Biz) December 4, 2012
DEMINT: “end this charade” and pass the bill House GOP already passed to give existing income tax rates and exchange defense cuts
— Amanda Carpenter (@amandacarpenter) December 4, 2012
DEMINT: “when you take money out from the economic climate, it destroys tasks…when you give politicians more money, they spend it.”
— Amanda Carpenter (@amandacarpenter) December 4, 2012
Bingo.
Jim DeMint’s a badass.
— Matthew Hurtt (@matthewhurtt) December 4, 2012
It’s on RT @jimdemint: Speaker Boehner’s provide of an $800b tax hike will destroy tasks and permit political leaders in Washington to invest even more
— Rick Wilson (@TheRickWilson) December 4, 2012
Right. RT @thestalwart: Jim DeMint blasts the Boehner program. read.bi/QEwehT
— BiasedGirl (@BiasedGirl) December 4, 2012
Some, particularly in the news, are pointing down that DeMint had an unusual view before.
Jim DeMint in Sept:“You can’t get a handle Obama without increasing taxes…We might as well slashed a bargain.” bloom.bg/11NlqQQ
— Chris Moody (@Chris_Moody) December 4, 2012
But, these Twitter people are planning on now.
Whenever we become too scared to face the principle issues of our time, there isn’t any hope of ever resolving all of them. Jim DeMint
— Mike Hinshaw (@baseballmh) December 4, 2012
Newsflash for GOP: opposition to taxes and investing could be the only explanation the majority of us tolerate you. Scarcely.
— David Burge (@iowahawkblog) December 3, 2012
As is other Sc Senator, Linsdey Graham.
We must have entitlement reform to prevent becoming Greece.
— Lindsey Graham (@GrahamBlog) December 4, 2012
Scary, but true.
Read more: http://twitchy.com/2012/12/04/sen-demint-slams-boehner-his-plan-will-destroy-american-jobs/
STOCK Act passes Congress, minds to Obama’s desk
http://twitter.com/#!/sybbys/status/183033614160773120
Amid the controversial reports of an innovative new law that would basically ban members of Congress from conducting functions of insider trading, the STOCK Act has actually eventually passed both the home and Senate and today awaits President Obama’s trademark. Here’s the latest report from POLITICO:
The Senate voted 96 to 3 to pass through a watered-down STOCK Act, which would bar members of Congress, their employees and some national workers from making money from non-public information obtained through their tasks.
“I believe people who result in the regulations should live underneath the same laws as everyone,” Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.), which authored an early version of the balance final fall, stated in a statement. “The passing of this legislation is a vital step toward restoring rely upon our federal government.”
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), who was simply additionally involved with shaping the STOCK Act, echoed Brown, phoning it “a powerful bill with teeth” and a “good action forward” to begin reestablishing trust with the American people.
Other individuals downplayed the significance for the legislation. “It’s a modest gesture,” Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) informed POLITICO, incorporating he believes lawmakers are usually prohibited from insider trading under present law.
Three Senators just who voted against cloture on STOCK Act – Burr R-NC, Coburn R-OK and Grassley R-IA
— Jamie Dupree (@jamiedupree) March 22, 2012
Let's all bang our minds against a wall at once…. 1-2-3 UGH! Senators ask to "tweak" (review liquid down) the… http://t.co/OzbrNNyI
— Waco Tea Party (@WacoTeaParty) March 19, 2012
Here is the official declaration from President Obama after hearing for the Congressional endorsement associated with STOCK Act:
In my own State associated with the Union Address, We outlined a blueprint for an economic climate where everybody else gets a reasonable chance, everyone does their particular fair share, and everybody plays because of the exact same collection of principles, including anyone who has already been chosen to serve the US individuals.
These days, I’m pleased Congress took bipartisan activity to pass the STOCK Act. After I signal this costs into legislation, Members of Congress will be unable to trade stocks centered on nonpublic information they gleaned on Capitol Hill. It’s a great first faltering step. Plus the months ahead, Congress should do much more to greatly help fight the destructive influence of cash in politics and rebuild the trust between Washington plus the American men and women.
Read more: http://twitchy.com/2012/03/22/stock-act-passes-congress-heads-to-obamas-desk/
These 10 Extremely Famous And Successful People Were Once Harshly Rejected. Here Are The Letters.
It is said that the road to success is paved with failure. That notion is completely true. Most people who are “successful” have faced failure time and again. However, no matter how many times they failed, those people just kept trying until they got it right. That’s the difference between someone who succeeds and someone who doesn’t. Failures will happen. You just have to know to keep trying. When these (soon to be) famous people received rejection letters, they didn’t let it get them down. Or if they did, they just used it to fuel their motivation… because they proved everyone wrong.
1.) U2: Bono, The Edge, Larry Mullen, Jr., and Adam Clayton formed their U2 in 1976 when they were just teens. In 1979, they submitted their first single to London-based RSO Records, who rejected them saying the music was “not suitable for us at present.” Within a year, U2 had signed with Island Records and released their first international single, “11 O’Clock Tick Tock.”
2.) Andy Warhol: In 1956, Andy Warhol attempted to donate his work to the Museum of Modern Art. On October 18th the artist received a letter rejecting the work “which you so generously offered as a gift to the Museum.” (Today, MoMA owns 168 of Warhol’s pieces.)
3.) Sylvia Plath: Howard Moss is The New Yorker editor that rejected Sylvia Plath’s Amnesiac. Although, he did admit that perhaps he was being “dense.”
4.) Madonna: This rejection letter sent to Madonna’s team most likely took place before she signed with Sire Records in 1982, a year before she released her first, self-titled album. That album sold more than 10 million copies worldwide. Even though she was not “ready yet.”
5.) Kurt Vonnegut: Later an award-winning novelist, Kurt Vonnegut was often rejected. In 1949, he received a letter from Edward Weeks, editor of The Atlantic Monthly, who said his samples “have drawn commendation although neither one is quite compelling enough for final acceptance.” A framed copy of the letter hangs in Indianapolis’ Kurt Vonnegut Memorial Library.
6.) Tim Burton: In 1976, while still a high-schooler, he sent a copy of his children’s book, The Giant Zlig, to Walt Disney Productions for publication consideration. It was rejected, but a few years later, the company brought Burton on as an animator’s apprentice.
7.) Gertrude Stein: This poet’s prose was too dense for Arthur C. Fifield to even bother reading the full manuscript for The Making of Americans, which he declined in 1912.
8.) Jim Lee: Today, Jim Lee is an artist, a writer, and the co-publisher of DC Comics. In the mid-1980s, he was struggling to find his place in the industry, and was even rejected by Marvel.
9.) Stieg Larsson: This rejection to his application to journalism school in Stockholm at the Joint Committee of Colleges of Journalism was discussed by publisher Christopher MacLehose, who said, “This is a letter saying ‘you are not good enough to be a journalist’ to a man who went on to create a supremely creative, crusading magazine which fought against the worsening tide of extreme right thinking and activity in Sweden.”
10.) Hunter S. Thompson: Technically, HST wrote this rejection letter to William McKeen, author of a 1991 biography of Thompson (he wasn’t a fan). Thompson sent McKeen a handwritten review of the book (which William then framed).
If failure ever slaps you across the face, take a page out of Madonna or U2’s book. Don’t give up. Not everyone will like what you do, but eventually, you will find a way. Source: Mental Floss Even celebrities know rejection. Share these letters with others by clicking below.