{"id":66176,"date":"2019-11-11T12:19:16","date_gmt":"2019-11-11T17:19:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/effectsofanxiety.net\/archives\/66176"},"modified":"2019-11-11T13:47:16","modified_gmt":"2019-11-11T18:47:16","slug":"social-reform-or-revolution","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/effectsofanxiety.net\/archives\/66176","title":{"rendered":"Social Reform Or Revolution"},"content":{"rendered":"At first view, the title of this work may be found surprising. Can the Social-Democracy be against reforms? Can we contra pose the social revolution, the transformation of the existing order, our final goal, to social reforms? Certainly not. The daily struggle for reforms, for the amelioration of the condition of the workers within the framework of the existing social order, and for democratic institutions, offers to the Social-Democracy an indissoluble tie. The struggle for reforms is its means; the social revolution, its aim. It is in Eduard Bernstein’s theory, presented in his articles on Problems of Socialism, Neue Zeit of 1897-98, and in his book Die Voraussetzungen des Socialismus und die Aufgaben der Sozialdemokratie[1] that we find, for the first time, the opposition of the two factors of the labor movement. His theory tends to counsel us to renounce the social transformation, the final goal of Social-Democracy and, inversely, to make of social reforms, the means of the class struggle, its aim. Bernstein himself has very clearly and characteristically formulated this viewpoint when he wrote: “The Final goal, no matter what it is, is nothing; the movement is everything.”\r\n\r\n