
Read more: https://imgflip.com/i/bo2oz

Read more: https://imgflip.com/i/bo2oz

Read more: https://imgflip.com/gif/5sinb
Nancy Pelosi isn’t the only one marveling at the Obama administration’s “strength” on Syria. Journo-doofus Ezra Klein has a swooning couch of his own:
http://twitter.com/#!/ezraklein/status/377503017953533953Durrrrrrrrr.
http://twitter.com/#!/RBPundit/status/377503776334028800 http://twitter.com/#!/TomMcCammon/status/377504890551291904 http://twitter.com/#!/Brand_Allen/status/377504188432789504 http://twitter.com/#!/BearingArmsCom/status/377504749605502976Clearly Ezra’s had enough:
http://twitter.com/#!/VodkaPundit/status/377505173242773504Heh.
http://twitter.com/#!/NancyDockins/status/377506551444951041Yep:
http://twitter.com/#!/LDoren/status/377503714740695040The depth of Klein’s lapdoggery is truly inconceivable.
http://twitter.com/#!/ShovelReadyArug/status/377508404643651584 http://twitter.com/#!/VodkaPundit/status/377505323507912704***
Update:
Ezra’s back for more:
http://twitter.com/#!/ezraklein/status/377510840116973568Serious, you guys.
http://twitter.com/#!/justkarl/status/377511723734822912 http://twitter.com/#!/RBPundit/status/377511637638336513***
Related:
ABC News is reporting that Lockheed Martin has dropped its plan to warn thousands of workers of impending layoffs, at least until after the election.
As Twitchy reported, the Office of Management and Budget on Friday sent revised guidance to defense contractors, saying that the government would pick up the legal costs incurred if they chose to ignore the WARN Act, which requires employers to give 60 days’ notice before a mass layoff or plant closing. In a statement, Lockheed acknowledged in a statement that the “allowable and recoverable” legal costs played a factor:
We will not issue sequestration-related WARN notices this year. The additional guidance offered important new information about the potential timing of DOD actions under sequestration, indicating that DOD anticipates no contract actions on or about 2 January, 2013, and that any action to adjust funding levels on contracts as a result of sequestration would likely not occur for several months after 2 Jan. The additional guidance further ensures that, if contract actions due to sequestration were to occur, our employees would be provided the protection of the WARN Act and that the costs of this protection would be allowable and recoverable.
@jaketapper that's illegal, isn't it?
— Elizabeth Scalia (@TheAnchoress) October 2, 2012
@jaketapper Sen Graham says that is illegal. Is it?
— Karen Townsend (@penguinponders) October 2, 2012
https://twitter.com/Dianne93101/status/252974404852658176
https://twitter.com/JasonBWhitman/status/252958956706742273
Lockheed Martin has now agreed not 2send layoff notices, thus violating the WARN Act. The Obama Admin has successfully bribed them. IMPEACH.
— KJack (@DrKC4) October 2, 2012
HIDE THE DECLINE: At White House Request, Lockheed Martin Drops Plan to Issue Layoff Notices. http://t.co/inZCZETj via @instapundit
— Instapundit.com (@instapundit) October 2, 2012

Read more: https://imgflip.com/i/bw6s3

Read more: https://imgflip.com/gif/103jk

Read more: https://imgflip.com/gif/8lm59

Read more: https://imgflip.com/i/bf1qy
The NFL free agent market opens up today and we can already take one big name off the list of potential stars looking for a new home. The New Orleans Saints have agreed to a brand new 5-year-deal with one of Drew Brees’ favorite targets Marques Colston.
Brees has been publicly unsatisfied with the team’s choice to place the franchise tag on him. Maybe this move will help make him a little happier.
Colston off the market now. Really like his game. The other Saints WR though, Meachem, not as big of a fan.
— Alen Dumonjić (@Dumonjic_Alen) March 13, 2012
Colston re-ups for 5 years in NO. Best fit for both sides. Colston is a huge weapon over the middle for the Saints
— Pro Football Focus (@PFF) March 13, 2012
Read more: http://twitchy.com/2012/03/13/saints-re-sign-marques-colston/
While discussing Obamacare’s individual mandate in Roanoke, Va., today, President Barack Obama said, “If you have health insurance, you’re not getting hit with a tax.” The obvious conclusion is that if you don’t have health insurance, you will get hit with a tax.
Oh Barack, now you’ve tossed Twitter into a tizzy:
Admits it is a tax, not a penalty? RT @mollyesque: Obama: "If you have health insurance, you're not getting hit with a tax."
— Andrew Kaczynski (@BuzzFeedAndrew) July 14, 2012
@BuzzFeedAndrew Sounded that way, didn't it?
— Molly Ball (@mollyesque) July 14, 2012
And the Obamabots are upset we’re even talking about such a thing! Leave King Barry alone!
@BuzzFeedAndrew I've never seen such a dumb word game consume our politics and media. Well, except maybe the "czars."
— Zachary Pleat (@zpleat) July 14, 2012
Meanwhile, conservatives add a little commentary on Obama’s rhetorical bumbling:
and if you don't…you are RT @mollyesque: Obama: "If you have health insurance, you're not getting hit with a tax."
— Amanda Carpenter (@amandacarpenter) July 14, 2012
It must be tough for Obama to keep track of all the taxes he wishes he could impose on America — he said as far back as 2009 that Obamacare was “absolutely not a tax increase.” Even the leftist dimwits at ThinkProgress can’t get it straight. And somewhere orbiting another universe, Donna Brazile has tried and failed to relabel it a “wellness penalty.” Good luck with that.
(Video courtesy of Buzzfeed.)
Read more: http://twitchy.com/2012/07/13/obama-implies-that-obamacare-individual-mandate-is-a-tax/